.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / How to deal with the North Korean nuclear threat?

페이지 정보

작성일2018-05-30 17:03 조회1,091회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] How to deal with the North Korean nuclear threat?

2016-10-19 15:08

Since North Korea conducted its fifth nuclear test on Oct. 9 this year, both South Korean and US governments, political leaders, scholars, research organizations and mass media have put forward their solutions to the issue. They can be classified into two categories: solutions through negotiations and solutions through confrontational actions.

Those who believe that the North Korean leadership is suffering from a siege mentality advocate solutions through negotiations. They suggest five types of negotiating formats: the US-North Korea bilateral talks; the US-South and North Korea trilateral talks; the US-South and North Korea-China quadrilateral talks; and the six-party talks.

They propose five topics as the subjects of negotiations: the abolition of the North Korean nuclear programs and the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula; a peace treaty replacing the existing armistice agreement; the end of the US-South Korea mutual defense treaty and the China-North Korea mutual assistance treaty; the establishment of diplomatic relationships between the US and North Korea and between Japan and North Korea; and the disarmament and arms control of both Koreas’ armed forces. Some suggest the first topic; others the second topic or both second and third topics; and still others all five topics.

As to the denuclearization of North Korea, the US government still prefers the six-party talks. But China, South and North Korea may prefer a different format, depending on the subjects of the negotiations. Many opinion-makers suggest the North Korea-US bilateral talks or the quadrilateral talks of the two Koreas, the US and China. Concerning a peace treaty to replace the existing armistice agreement, the US proposes a US-North Korea bilateral negotiation, but South and North Korea have not made any official statement on the subject, although North Korea has rejected the US-North Korea bilateral talks only for the discussion of the denuclearization issue.

The multilateral talks can take either a four-party format which includes the main actors in the Korean War (the two Koreas and the US and China) or a six-party format which includes the six countries in Northeast Asia. Whether these multi-party talks take a quadrilateral or hexagonal format, this peace maintenance structure will have to turn into a regional collective security system (or a concert of powers system). To establish this system, all the five topics mentioned above should be discussed and resolved.

The South Korean and US governments, some political leaders, scholars, research organizations and mass media advocate confrontational actions, condemning the conciliatory approaches.

One approach promoted by the US and South Korean governments and supported by many conservative scholars, mass media and research organizations holds that in resorting to all kinds of maneuvers and provocations, North Korea has rejected and ignored all the conciliatory offers by the US and South Korea and has continued its nuclear development and perfected its nuclear capabilities. Now, the only alternative left to the US and South Korea is that the two allies, together with the UN, impose complete economic and financial sanctions on North Korea, while urging UN member states to downgrade their diplomatic relations with North Korea and to expel it from international organizations. They particularly demand China, which is the main supporter of North Korea, to fully execute the economic sanctions required by the UNSC resolutions and put pressure on North Korea to abandon its nuclear program. Meanwhile, the two allies should maintain various kinds of military measures including preparations for a preemptive attack.

On the other hand, the US and South Korea should jointly guarantee China and North Korea that the US forces would never resort to pre-emptive attacks against North Korea unless it is clear the latter is about to launch a nuclear attack. They should also assure China the US would never station its troops in North Korea even in such a case the US-South Korean forces occupy North Korea.

Another proposal supported by some moderates is that the US-North Korea bilateral talks or the six-party talks can be reopened to discuss the complete denuclearization of North Korea together with the complete denuclearization of South Korea, and a non-aggression treaty between the US and North Korea guaranteed by the other concerned parties, accompanied by economic aid, the normalization of diplomatic relations between North Korea and the US and between North Korea and Japan, and assistance to North Korea’s participation in the international economic and financial organizations.

Which approach is appropriate, negotiation or confrontation?  Unless we have the accurate intelligence on the nature of the North Korean leadership and the true motive of its nuclear ambition, it will be impossible to choose the best strategy toward North Korea’s nuclear threat. In concrete terms, the correct intelligence on the following questions should be secured.

First, is Kim Jong-un in firm control of the North Korean elites?  Second, is what the North Korean regime says about the purpose and degree of development of its nuclear program actually true or a bluff or faint motion?  Third, are the quid pro quos for the dismantlement of its nuclear program demanded by North Korea such as a peace treaty between the US and North Korea, a Korean Peninsula peace regime, the end of the South Korea-US alliance and a disarmament and arms control treaty between the two Koreas a mere camouflage or its ultimate aim to communize South Korea?

Finally, do the US and South Korean authorities have accurate intelligence on the exact locations of Kim Jong-un and his Praetorian Guard, nuclear weapons and launching apparatus?

By Park Sang-seek

Park Sang-seek is a former rector of the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies at Kyung Hee University and the author of “Globalized Korea and Localized Globe.” He can be reached at parksangseek@hotmail.com. ― Ed.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 9 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
207 자연 보전 그리고 인간 보전 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1529
2011-05-10
1529
206 세계화된 사고로 이슬람채권 받아들여야 / 최승호
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1616
2011-05-10
1616
205 상하이 추문 외교부, 외부에서 개혁해야 / 박동순
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1534
2011-05-10
1534
204 '中東 딜레마'에 빠진 서방세계 / 윤영관
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1407
2011-05-10
1407
203 이북 5도청 대대적 쇄신이 필요한 때 / 김용규
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1733
2011-05-10
1733
202 Implications of Arab democracy…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1354
2011-05-10
1354
201 中東 전문가 없는 對중동 외교 / 박찬진
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1620
2011-05-10
1620
200 [아랍권 민주화 소용돌이]‘재스민 불길’ 어디까지- 駐…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1468
2011-05-10
1468
199 국가 정보기능 강화의 '쓴 약'이 되길 - 라종일
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1390
2011-05-10
1390
198 초대 유엔대사 노창희 前차관이 말하는 유엔 가입 ‘막전…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1557
2011-05-10
1557
197 술레이만은 한·이집트 수교 ‘비밀 특사’ / 임성준
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1491
2011-05-10
1491
196 중국의 세계화인가, 세계의 중국화인가 / 윤영관
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1259
2011-05-10
1259
195 퍼져가는 민주화 물결, 혼돈 속의 민주정치 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1378
2011-05-10
1378
194 교과서가 바로잡혀야 역사교육이 산다 / 이인호
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1363
2011-05-10
1363
193 북한에 가장 매력적 선물은 명분 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1332
2011-05-10
1332
192 미·중 정상회담 지켜보는 한국인의 시각 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1224
2011-05-10
1224
191 국내 정치용 대북 논쟁 제발 그만 / 윤영관
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1254
2011-05-10
1254
190 유엔의 전진이 계속되어야 할 이유 / 반기문
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1285
2011-05-10
1285
189 카타르의 강력한 월드컵 유치 리더십 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1290
2011-05-10
1290
188 북의 평화적 핵 이용권" 中 언급, 위험하다 / 신동연
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1279
2011-05-10
1279
187 Emergence of new U.S. Asia str…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1314
2011-05-10
1314
186 [시론] 북한 연평도 포격, 안보리에 제기해야 한다 /…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1309
2011-05-10
1309
185 북이 서울을 포격해 오면 / 윤영관
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1305
2011-05-10
1305
184 안보 위기일수록 외교가 중요하다 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1313
2011-05-10
1313
183 북한의 도발 초전 박살 낼 뒷심을 기르자 / 신두병
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1349
2011-05-10
1349
182 野일각 대선후보 거론, 전혀 도움 안돼 / 반기문 유엔…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1275
2011-05-10
1275
181 G20 이후의 세상, 정치가 걱정이다 / 이홍구
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1333
2011-05-10
1333
180 G20, 마음으로 만나야 파국 막는다 / 윤영관
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1237
2011-05-10
1237
179 Nobel Peace Prize: Is it for p…
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1186
2011-05-10
1186
178 “기업, 재무제표보다 기술가치로 평가” / 이승환 대사
일자: 05-10 | 조회: 1567
2011-05-10
1567
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr