.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / Korea’s national security triad put to test

페이지 정보

작성일2018-05-30 17:12 조회885회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] Korea’s national security triad put to test

2016-11-20 15:25

Most Korean people believed and hoped that Donald Trump would not be elected US president.

This was not so much because they were misled by US media reports as because they believed that if he became president, he would demand full payment of the cost of stationing US troops in Korea and withdraw them if he did not get what he wanted.

This kind of mendicant mentality is ironical and very dangerous for Korean national security.

In this sense, Koreans suffer from a dualistic mentality. They believe that South Korea’s military forces are far superior to North Korea’s in conventional arms because it is economically and technologically far superior to the other.

The only problem is North Korea’s nuclear weaponry. To make it worse, some Koreans are anti-American, believing that the US is imperialistic and uses South Korea as a military base in the Far East to contain or encircle potential enemies such as China and Russia.

Because of this belief, they tend to favor China over the US. But the fault lies with Korea rather than the US. A state which depends on a foreign power militarily is not a true independent state.

If a country is confronted with a great power, it has two choices. One way is to subordinate itself to that neighboring power. Korea had historically maintained a tributary status in relations with China until it lost its independence to Japan. Another way is to maintain an alliance with another great power.

Since South Korea regained independence from Japan, it has maintained an alliance relationship with the US in order to protect itself from not only North Korea but also the other communist neighbors.

Since the Cold War South Korea has maintained good neighborly relations with its neighboring big powers, while the two Koreas have remained hostile. In a purely military sense, South Korea is capable of dealing with North Korea’s military threat in a conventional war. If it is not yet in possession of a self-sufficient defense capability, it is its own fault. It has been dependent on the US military for so long that it has developed a kind of dependent mentality.

South Korea is responsible for the delay of transfer of wartime operational control from the US to South Korea. Under the present combined forces command system South Korean forces depend on the US forces.

Moreover, until North Korea abandons its nuclear arsenal, the US will provide extended nuclear deterrence. If the US withdraws its nuclear umbrella and North Korea refuses to abandon its nuclear weaponry, South Korea has no choice but to develop nuclear weapons.

But if the US decides to sever its alliance with South Korea, South Korea will have to build an entirely new security apparatus. It is highly unlikely that the US will abandon South Korea in the present international environment, but South Korea should be prepared for any kind of change in the security environment of Northeast Asia. The political leaders and people in general are divided into the pro-US, pro-China, pro-Russia and pro-Japan factions on the question of how to defend South Korea against any of them and to deal with the North Korean threat, just as in the last period of the 19th century.

Under the present circumstances, maintenance of the ROK-US alliance and security cooperation with Japan is the best choice for South Korea. Japan is a lesser evil than China and Russia, not because Japan is more reliable than the other two, but because Korea and Japan share the same security goal which is supported by the US. The alliance between a big and a small power always costs the latter more than the former.

A more urgent task for South Korea is to build a self-reliant defense force as soon as possible. How long should South Korea postpone the transfer of wartime operational control from the US? The longer it is delayed, the longer dependence of the South Korean military on its US counterpart will last.

It is a cowardly behavior, admission of Korea’s military incompetence or the revelation of its mendicant mentality. Trump’s policy may give South Korea a strong impetus to build a self-reliant defense capability.

When a country is in a domestic crisis as South Korea is now, the triad of government branches in charge of diplomacy, intelligence and defense becomes crucially important. This is the reason why, in all states, government control is strong in these three areas than in any other areas.

This is particularly so, because South Korea is under the direct threat of North Korea. National survival is directly affected by how efficiently and effectively these branches operate. They should closely cooperate in planning and executing national security policies, particularly the North Korea strategy.

For this purpose, these three arms of national security should make all-out efforts to eradicate bureaucratic sclerosis, politicization and personal incompetence. First, they should root out the malfeasant, irresponsible and selfish behavior warned by the Peter Principle and Parkinson’s Law. Second, they should maintain political neutrality, which is an important principle of bureaucracy.

Third, they should be run by the most competent personnel so that the Foreign Ministry can pursue proactive rather than reactive diplomacy and the National Intelligence Agency can secure the independent capability to obtain the primary sources of intelligence, while the Defense Ministry can maintain the most advanced military system and highly professional soldiers. Finally, the government in a crisis should pursue a strictly bi-partisan national security policy.

By Park Sang-seek

Park Sang-seek is a former rector of the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies, Kyung Hee University, and the author of “Globalized Korea and Localized Globe.” He can be reached at parksangseek@hotmail.com. – Ed.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 7 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
267 <외교열전> 한중수교 기틀 닦은 중국 어뢰정 사…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3090
2012-03-09
3090
266 <외교열전> 9시간 만에 막 내린 모스크바 인질…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 2945
2012-03-09
2945
265 <외교열전> '태산명동서일필'로 끝난 코리아게이…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3169
2012-03-09
3169
264 <외교열전> '초근목피' 들고 유엔 간 외무장관…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 2212
2012-03-09
2212
263 <외교열전> 北 이집트대사 망명사건 '막전막후'…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3305
2012-03-09
3305
262 <외교열전> 우루과이 쌀협상서 '日 몽니' 눌렀…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3616
2012-03-09
3616
261 <외교열전> '법전' 든 대사관..유족 恨 풀어…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 3253
2012-02-24
3253
260 <외교열전> 사선 넘나든 남북大使 '동반 탈출'…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 5977
2012-02-24
5977
259 <외교열전> 김만철 일가를 데려와라
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 3266
2012-02-24
3266
258 <외교열전> 경수로 노형결정 '피말리는' 막전막…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 2759
2012-02-24
2759
257 <외교열전> '3중국' APEC 가입 한국외교가…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 3425
2012-02-24
3425
256 <외교열전> 월남탈출 교민,생계위해 이란行 택…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 2900
2012-02-24
2900
255 <외교열전> 페루 日대사관저 인질극 '공포의72…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 1924
2012-02-24
1924
254 <외교열전> '마유미' 극비호송..그 숨막혔던 …
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 4012
2012-02-24
4012
253 [시론-이춘선] 여수엑스포 성공하려면
일자: 02-23 | 조회: 1676
2012-02-23
1676
252 [시론-이춘선] 2조달러 발상은 中南美시장에서
일자: 02-23 | 조회: 1299
2012-02-23
1299
251 이념투쟁으로 변질된 한·미 FTA / 김용규
일자: 11-14 | 조회: 1584
2011-11-14
1584
250 <외교열전> '南核' 안보리 문턱까지 갔었다 /…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 1681
2011-09-28
1681
249 <외교열전> 北대사 막판까지 유엔 동시가입 몰랐…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 1965
2011-09-28
1965
248 <외교열전> 美中 정찰기 충돌갈등, 한국이 풀…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 2109
2011-09-28
2109
247 <외교열전> 불시착機에 中 미사일 전문가 탔었…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 3357
2011-09-28
3357
246 <외교열전> 한중수교때 김일성 '자주노선' 선…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 4152
2011-09-28
4152
245 사회적 시장경제를 위하여 / 박찬진
일자: 09-09 | 조회: 1495
2011-09-09
1495
244 8·15에 생각하는 민주국가의 위기 / 이홍구
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1369
2011-08-16
1369
243 2012 북한의 변화에 거는 기대 / 이홍구
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1359
2011-08-16
1359
242 분열의 계절 … 통합의 선구자들 / 이홍구
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1393
2011-08-16
1393
241 [Park Sang-seek] War between A…
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 1806
2011-08-09
1806
240 한반도로 몰려드는 세계 정치경제의 먹구름 / 윤영관
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 1469
2011-08-09
1469
239 [ESSAY ] 이은주의 사진으로 만난 인연 / 이인호
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 3633
2011-08-09
3633
238 중국 급부상에 맞춘 전략 찾자 / 박종선
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 2087
2011-08-09
2087
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr