.


회원 언론기고 및 출판





<코리아헤럴드> 박상식 / North Korea’s nuclear power undermines the South …

페이지 정보

작성일2018-06-05 15:07 조회823회 댓글0건

본문

[Park Sang-seek] North Korea’s nuclear power undermines the South Korea-US alliance

2018-02-19 17:52

North Korea’s development of nuclear weapons is primarily to counter the US extended deterrence for South Korea. But its impact is spreading to other areas -- inter-Korean relations and the US-South Korea alliance.

When North Korea approached South Korea after it had successfully launched an inter-continental missile in the direction of the US continent, both South Korea and the US strongly condemned it, but Seoul’s reaction was much less strong than Washington’s. Moreover, The South Korean government is more interested in the South-North Korea contact than North Korea’s rapid development of nuclear weapons.

The government tells the people that if a bilateral meeting is held, it will discuss all the pending issues including North Korea’s nuclear development but it does not explicitly mention it because it fears that North Korea will not attend any kind of inter-Korean dialogue in which the North Korean nuclear issue is included as a subject of discussion.

I am not privy to the formal and information meetings between both Korean officials during the opening day of the Pyongchang Winter Olympics but confident of my speculation because North Korea must have wanted to find out South Korea’s sincerity for the inter-Korean rapprochement and, at the same time, the degree of solidarity between the US and South Korea and the degree of control the US has over the South.

Faced with the unprecedentedly strong UN sanctions, North Korea is being almost completely isolated from the rest of the world. South Korea is perhaps the last hope for its survival.

On the other hand, the US has maintained the same position on North Korea. In view of this, it was quite natural that US Vice President Pence purposely avoided meeting the high-level North Korean delegation. The difference between President Moon Jae-in and US President Donald Trump in their approaches to North Korea is in terms the subjects of discussion at any inter-Korean meetings: Trump insists that at inter-Korean meetings both Koreas should discuss the North Korean nuclear issue, while Moon holds that the South-North meetings can include the nuclear issue as one of the topics of reduction of tension between both Koreas because North Korea will not meet to discuss exclusively the North Korean nuclear issue. North Korea’s rationale for its nuclear development is that since the US protects South Korea by nuclear weapons, it has no choice but to produce its own. The North Korean leader argues that the ultimate solution is that neither side maintains nuclear weapons, reminding us that he is still not completely convinced that the US does not have nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula and that it maintains nuclear weapons on Japanese territory and Guam, both of which are close to the Korean Peninsula.

He never believes the American and South Korean commitments that the US will never resort to its nuclear weapons unless the allied conventional forces are completely incapacitated, reminding it of the fact that the US has not abandoned the principle of no first use of nuclear weapons.

The North Korean leader believes that by becoming a nuclear power, North Korea will be placed on an equal footing with the US in any future war and in bilateral negotiations. This thinking is based on the assumption that the North Korean conventional military forces can deal with their South Korean counterparts on the Korean Peninsula if American forces are not stationed there. This is the reason why Pyongyang has been consistently demanding a peace treaty with the US since 2010. The peace treaty includes a provision on the withdrawal of foreign troops from Korea.

North Korea also demands a peace treaty as a condition for the abandonment of its nuclear and missile system. Theoretically, its demand is reasonable: The US is committed to extended deterrence to South Korea, but China has not made a similar commitment to North Korea explicitly, although it can under the China-North Korea mutual defense treaty. But in reality, the Sino-North Korean military coalition has greater geographical and logistic advantages than the US-South Korea military alliance. In view of the above security situation on the Korean Peninsula, it is necessary for South Korea to keep the US forces on its territory. Knowing this perfectly, Pyongyang demands the withdrawal of the US military forces in South Korea.

The US supported the bilateral talks between both Koreas on the eve of the PyongChang Olympics on the condition (or in the hope) that both parties touch on the North Korean nuclear issue. But so far no mass media at home and abroad have reported that they discussed the issue.

For fear of the North Korean delegation’s strong opposition, the South Korean delegation might have not brought up the issue. The reason why US Vice President Mike Pence avoided the North Korean delegation is clear: The US had no interest in a greeting ceremony with the North Korean leaders and actually wanted to show that the US officials could meet only when North Korean officials were willing to discuss the nuclear issue.

The Trump administration would have been disappointed if Moon had avoided any discussion of the North Korean nuclear issue. This will damage the close bond between South Korea and the US when the North Korean delegates emphasized the blood ties between North and South Koreans during their stay in South Korea, the US leadership must have had a uncomfortable feeling.

North Korea’s diplomacy and propaganda campaign during the Olympic period have been quite successful. If the Moon government becomes more interested in improving the South-North relationship than abolishing the North Korean nuclear program, it is neither a wise nor correct strategy.

The South might think that both sides become friendly, the North will ultimately abandon its nuclear program. It is a naive thinking. South Korea’s urgent task at the moment is to make North Korea abandon the latter’s nuclear and missile program. Otherwise, it will damage the US-ROK alliance and make the US-North Korea relationship worse than ever before.


Park Sang-seek
Park Sang-seek is a former rector of the Graduate Institute of Peace Studies, Kyung-Hee University and the author of Globalized Korea and Localized Globe. -- Ed.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

  Total 447건 7 페이지
회원 언론기고 및 출판 목록
번호 제목
267 <외교열전> 한중수교 기틀 닦은 중국 어뢰정 사…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3100
2012-03-09
3100
266 <외교열전> 9시간 만에 막 내린 모스크바 인질…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 2951
2012-03-09
2951
265 <외교열전> '태산명동서일필'로 끝난 코리아게이…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3178
2012-03-09
3178
264 <외교열전> '초근목피' 들고 유엔 간 외무장관…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 2215
2012-03-09
2215
263 <외교열전> 北 이집트대사 망명사건 '막전막후'…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3309
2012-03-09
3309
262 <외교열전> 우루과이 쌀협상서 '日 몽니' 눌렀…
일자: 03-09 | 조회: 3623
2012-03-09
3623
261 <외교열전> '법전' 든 대사관..유족 恨 풀어…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 3261
2012-02-24
3261
260 <외교열전> 사선 넘나든 남북大使 '동반 탈출'…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 5979
2012-02-24
5979
259 <외교열전> 김만철 일가를 데려와라
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 3269
2012-02-24
3269
258 <외교열전> 경수로 노형결정 '피말리는' 막전막…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 2761
2012-02-24
2761
257 <외교열전> '3중국' APEC 가입 한국외교가…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 3434
2012-02-24
3434
256 <외교열전> 월남탈출 교민,생계위해 이란行 택…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 2904
2012-02-24
2904
255 <외교열전> 페루 日대사관저 인질극 '공포의72…
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 1930
2012-02-24
1930
254 <외교열전> '마유미' 극비호송..그 숨막혔던 …
일자: 02-24 | 조회: 4025
2012-02-24
4025
253 [시론-이춘선] 여수엑스포 성공하려면
일자: 02-23 | 조회: 1680
2012-02-23
1680
252 [시론-이춘선] 2조달러 발상은 中南美시장에서
일자: 02-23 | 조회: 1301
2012-02-23
1301
251 이념투쟁으로 변질된 한·미 FTA / 김용규
일자: 11-14 | 조회: 1587
2011-11-14
1587
250 <외교열전> '南核' 안보리 문턱까지 갔었다 /…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 1688
2011-09-28
1688
249 <외교열전> 北대사 막판까지 유엔 동시가입 몰랐…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 1969
2011-09-28
1969
248 <외교열전> 美中 정찰기 충돌갈등, 한국이 풀…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 2112
2011-09-28
2112
247 <외교열전> 불시착機에 中 미사일 전문가 탔었…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 3361
2011-09-28
3361
246 <외교열전> 한중수교때 김일성 '자주노선' 선…
일자: 09-28 | 조회: 4156
2011-09-28
4156
245 사회적 시장경제를 위하여 / 박찬진
일자: 09-09 | 조회: 1499
2011-09-09
1499
244 8·15에 생각하는 민주국가의 위기 / 이홍구
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1371
2011-08-16
1371
243 2012 북한의 변화에 거는 기대 / 이홍구
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1363
2011-08-16
1363
242 분열의 계절 … 통합의 선구자들 / 이홍구
일자: 08-16 | 조회: 1396
2011-08-16
1396
241 [Park Sang-seek] War between A…
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 1809
2011-08-09
1809
240 한반도로 몰려드는 세계 정치경제의 먹구름 / 윤영관
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 1470
2011-08-09
1470
239 [ESSAY ] 이은주의 사진으로 만난 인연 / 이인호
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 3644
2011-08-09
3644
238 중국 급부상에 맞춘 전략 찾자 / 박종선
일자: 08-09 | 조회: 2090
2011-08-09
2090
게시물 검색







한국외교협회 | 개인정보 보호관리자: 박경훈
E-mail: kcfr@hanmail.net

주소: 서울시 서초구 남부순환로 294길 33
TEL: 02-2186-3600 | FAX: 02-585-6204

Copyright(c) 한국외교협회 All Rights Reserved.
hosting by 1004pr